Make a convincing argument for BOTH sides of an issue that has been Essay

open a convincing argument for BOTH sides of an issue that has been considered by the U.S. Supreme Court or a U.S. Court of Appeals within the past twenty years or so - Essay ExampleThe join States Supreme Court has enunciated a number of ways that student athlete drug testing does not infringe the Fourth Amendment Right or any some other that various students ache filed suits on, especially the spicy nurture athletes.The first case that attracted a lot of attention was the Vernonia v. Acton where student athletes, in back of their parents, accused their school in court for violating their rights through the drug tests. However, the United States Supreme Court govern against the students by allowing the open school to continue with the organization of the drug tests. From this verdict, it is see the light that the students do not have the option of evading the tests and the public schools have the permission of using force moreover, this could apply even when the school adm inistration does not have any reason suggesting that the student may have abused drugs.Based on the results of this, public schools in different parts of United States initiated drug-testing programs for every student participating in other supplementary undertakings including being members of certain clubs. A few years later, the Supreme Court experienced some other case of Board of Education v. Earls where the court supported the general practice giving all public schools the mandate to administer drug tests to all scholars who engaged in any activities sanctioned by the school administration. Additionally, the Supreme Court also went further to permit the subjecting of drug tests even the rest of the students that did not inscribe in extracurricular activities.Essentially, even before the Vernonia v. Acton case, the United States Court of Appeal had made it clear that it is not necessary that public schools have an apparent reason to frisk scholars in the New tee shirt v. TLO case. All the same, the public schools required a rational notion of the student engaging in unauthorized actions relatively, this